SITE ReportMay 3, 2024
|
Primary Site name: IBDAR
Other Site Names: JADIS: 2223013, khirbet abdar
|
|
Governorate:
IRBID
Sub-governorate:
Bany Kenanah
MEGA Number:
2799
|
Site Map:
Coordinates
(Long Lat):
35.78917 32.66467, 35.78905 32.66506, 35.7889 32.66499, 35.78874 32.66487, 35.78844 32.66478, 35.78855 32.66447, 35.78875 32.66432, 35.78903 32.6644, 35.78917 32.66467
Total Area (m²):
3436.7;
Perimeter (m):
231.8
Buffer Zone (m):
0
Period(s) Recorded for Site:
| 9047 (Byzantine, Early); 9049 (Byzantine, Unspecified); 9054 (Islamic, Mamluk); 9999 (Unspecified/Unknown Period) |
DoA Office Responsible:
| Irbid Antiquities office |
Site Investigators:
Investigator(s):
2007-2008 Data, DOA; None
Investigation Date:
None
Site Comments:
[e.g., accuracy of coordinates; directions to Site]
Site Significance:
| Scientific Value | |
| Historical Value | |
| Aesthetic Value | |
| Social Value | |
| Spiritual Value |
Surveys:
Record History:
Last Modified By
Last Modified On
Record Created By
ORIGINAL IMPORT
Record Created On
July 1, 2010
Record Review Status:
Status:
Approved
Reviewer:
None
Review Date:
None
Comments:
The following 6 site element(s) have been recognized at this site:
| MEGA Number | Element Type | Period(s) Recorded for Site Element: |
| 16522 | 902 Sherd/Flint Scatter or Other Material Culture (Excavated) | 9049 Byzantine, Unspecified |
| 16523 | 414 Sarcophagus/Stone Anthropode Coffin | 9999 Unspecified/Unknown Period |
| 16524 | 901 Sherd/Flint Surface Scatter (Unexcavated) | 9054 Islamic, Mamluk |
| 16525 | 901 Sherd/Flint Surface Scatter (Unexcavated) | 9047 Byzantine, Early |
| 16526 | 810 Isolated Structure/House | 9999 Unspecified/Unknown Period |
| 16527 | 304 Mosque | 9999 Unspecified/Unknown Period |
Site References:
| Primary Author | Date | Title |
| MITTMANN S. | 1970 | Beitrage zur Siedlungs- und Territorialgeschichte des NorlichenOstjordanlandes , Wiesbaden. (= AbhDPV) |
There are 0 images or pdfs associated with this Site.
Site images can be viewed and printed from MEGA.
This report summarizes the existing information in the system and should never be regarded as a final statement on the archaeological site being considered, nor should it be substituted for an on-site survey.
