Primary Site name: TEIM
Other Site Names: JADIS: 2212014
Governorate: MADABA Sub-governorate: Madaba
MEGA Number: 11193
Site Map:
Coordinates (Long Lat): 35.77437 31.69551, 35.77437 31.69563, 35.77452 31.69563, 35.77452 31.69551, 35.77437 31.69551
Total Area (m²): 198.8; Perimeter (m): 56.4
Buffer Zone (m): 0
Period(s) Recorded for Site:
9023 (Early Bronze IV (EB-MB)); 9034 (Iron Age III (Persian)); 9043 (Nabataean, Unspecified); 9046 (Roman, Unspecified); 9999 (Unspecified/Unknown Period)
DoA Office Responsible:
Madaba Antiquities Office
Site Investigators:
Investigator(s): JADIS IMPORT, DOA; None
Investigation Date: None
Site Comments: [e.g., accuracy of coordinates; directions to Site]
Site Significance:
Scientific Value
Historical Value
Aesthetic Value
Social Value
Spiritual Value
Surveys:
Record History:
Last Modified By Samar Habahbeh
Last Modified On March 16, 2016
Record Created By ORIGINAL IMPORT
Record Created On July 1, 2010
Record Review Status:
Status: Under Review
Reviewer: None
Review Date: None
Comments:
The following 7 site element(s) have been recognized at this site:
MEGA NumberElement TypePeriod(s) Recorded for Site Element:
50090901 Sherd/Flint Surface Scatter (Unexcavated)
9046 Roman, Unspecified
50091835 Water Structure, Cistern
9999 Unspecified/Unknown Period
50092901 Sherd/Flint Surface Scatter (Unexcavated)
9034 Iron Age III (Persian)
50093901 Sherd/Flint Surface Scatter (Unexcavated)
9023 Early Bronze IV (EB-MB)
50094505 Cave/Shelter
9999 Unspecified/Unknown Period
50095899 Unspecified/Unknown General Site Element (Specify)
9999 Unspecified/Unknown Period
50096901 Sherd/Flint Surface Scatter (Unexcavated)
9043 Nabataean, Unspecified
Site References:
Primary AuthorDateTitle
GLUECK N.1933Explorations in Eastern Palestine I , Philadelphia. (AASOR 14 =EEP 1)
MUSIL A.1908Arabia Petraea. I: Moab, II: Edom. Topographischer Reisebericht, Wien.
There are 0 images or pdfs associated with this Site.
Site images can be viewed and printed from MEGA.

This report summarizes the existing information in the system and should never be regarded as a final statement on the archaeological site being considered, nor should it be substituted for an on-site survey.